The difference is not statistically significant, but the trend is so clear that we believe the results give good reason to recommend high-intensity training for the elderly,” Stensvold explains. The percentage was 6% in the moderate group. “In the interval training group, 3% of the participants had died after five years. High-intensity interval training also had the greatest positive effect on fitness,” according to Stensvold.ĬHECK OUT: New Intermittent Fasting Program Shown to Suppress Cancer and Metabolic Disease in Mice and Humansīut does this kind of exercise prolong life to a greater extent than moderate exercise? “Both physical and mental quality of life were better in the high-intensity group after five years than in the other two groups. And our study results show that on top of that, training regularly at high intensity has an extra positive effect,” says Dorthe Stensvold, a professor in the university’s Cardiac Exercise Research Group. “First of all, I have to say that exercise in general seems to be good for the health of the elderly. This group was not offered organized training under the auspices of Generation 100, but was called in for regular health checks and fitness assessments. The third group, the control group, was advised to exercise according to the Norwegian health authorities’ recommendations. ![]() ![]() RELATED: Training for Your First Marathon ‘Reverses’ Aging of Major Blood Vessels on Par With Medication The participants could choose whether they wanted to train on their own or participate in group training with instructors. Group two was instructed to train at a steady, moderate intensity for 50 minutes. One group was assigned to high-intensity interval training (HIIT) using the 4X4 method twice a week-doing 4 minutes of 85-95% maximum heart rate aerobic exercise and 4 minutes of 60% maximum heart rate for 4 rounds.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |